~~~~~~~~~~~~
Protect
Your Family
Use Your
Miranda Rights
Learn More
Find your Legislative
Representative for any state. The link provided will give you a visual
location of exactly who is your representative in your area:
Click Here
~~~~~~~~~ Other References that may be of
Interest From NCCPR
Under
development are a variety of titles to eReference Books to be
placed on the net. All eReferences can be easily printed out for
future reference. So click on any Title like this. Come back and check this index for
your review and information.
We all have
heard "best interest of the child".
Here is a man, Bill Bowen,
making a film about that. I know some of you will feel rubbed
the wrong way for one reason or another, but I think that we
must think about all angles of this question so that we can make
intelligent arguments about what the system is doing wrong and
what we need to do to make it better. Warning there are some
graphic parts of this. They are also looking for present or
former social workers that want to be part of this project. I
am just putting this out there for consideration.
Big
Brother, Big Business Posted on website 08/18/09
There was a documentary on several
months ago called "Big Brother, Big Business" (it was on this
evening also, but I didn't watch it again) and I believe Google was
one of the companies named for giving information to law enforcement
without a warrant. If I remember correctly, Google is also the one
who keeps a permanent record of ALL of your searches through them.
I found a couple of links that supposedly have the full length
version of the documentary that aired on CNBC. I encourage all of
you to watch this documentary, especially since we're talking about
privacy issues for our group members. Here are the links:
(Reference from blog:
http://fightcps.com/2007/11/17/oregon-foster-parents-should-not-be-allowed-to-adopt/
)
I am a former foster parent because in order to adopt I was forced to be
and that is a way of life in Oregon and as I have posted before, as long
as DHS can keep the parents who have been victims of DHS wrongly
targeted at the throats of the foster parents, they are playing right
into the hands of DHS. Children will be removed from homes and some
should be. To deny that fact reflects an attitude of unawareness that is
really scary. A child found playing in their parents meth lab for
example, or a toddler found out in traffic while the stoned parent slept
on the couch should be removed and protected. What happens after that
within DHS is the real crime you have to worry about. Those of you with
children in custody already know that.
I have spoken to Neil (whose blog this is I
believe) previously about this intolerable situation and know how
strongly he believes in this cause. I am glad he is there.
The real enemy here is the corrupt agency,
DHS/CPS, and the other corrupt departments and agencies that are making
money off of your children.
You, as a parent, are forced to undergo psych
evaluations at the hands of people who are under contract with DHS to
provide psychological services. Yet many of those same “Mental Health
Workers” have no license of any kind. They cannot legally trim your
dog’s fur nor work on your nails. One such pseudo psychologist in
Klamath Falls, OR, where the poster below, Chrystal Shuggars lives, has
22 contracts with DHS, some permitting payment, “Not to exceed $4,000
per day.” Compare that to the $25,000 per year our state senators earn.
That man has no license of any kind yet has been the main person DHS
refers parents to for evaluation and treatment. If you refuse to be
treated by that DHS contracted, non-qualified pseudo psychologist, that
is used against you in court. The other “psychologist” used by DHS in
Klamath Falls until she was recently investigated, again, by the state,
claimed over and over in court records to be a “psychologist Resident”
working under a licensed psychologist in another city. The problem was
that psychologist said she did not work with him during the time she
claimed she did. She was charged with practicing psychology without a
license and she even stipulated to that fact and was fined, Yet, DHS
kept on using her anyway and she testified in court cases and never
mentioned what she was facing at the hands of Board of Psychologist
Examiners at the very time she was testifying. Ah, the ethics of DHS/CPS
and those who are dependent on DHS for their livelihood! Then look at
the fact that during one hearing a judge made the statement that no
Judge in that county had ruled against DHS or for the parents in any
Termination of Parental Rights Case or permanent guardianship trial, for
over ten years. It’s actually in over thirteen years. Not once. Add to
that the fact that the Indigent Defenders Service or court appointed
lawyers in that county haven’t won a case involving termination or
permanent guardianship in those same thirteen years, yet they receive
the contract every two years for over 5.2 million dollars. A recent
audit, called because of complaints, found a serious shortage of money
that couldn’t be explained. That shortage, rumored to be over $40,000
per month is being investigated currently. Things are so bad in Oregon
with DHS using non-licensed psychs that in response to an inquiry by the
former head of the Board of Psychologist Examiners, Martin Petioni, the
office of the Attorney General issued a legal opinion on just how
illegal it was for DHS to use the “unlicensed psychologists” DHS was
using. This was and is so bad that as a parent even if you can afford
your own independent psychologist, you are denied permission to use
anyone other the DHS contracted psychologists wannabes. You can read the
Attorney Generals legal opinion on this subject at
http://www.doj.state.or.us/agoffice/agopinions/op2006-1.pdf
Before you get too excited about this understand that the very powerful
DHS lobby, led by a Ms. Patti O’Sulivan, I believe her name is, and with
the help of State Senator Mones- Anderson and a few others actually
passed into law, this year, a revision in the ORS’ which now allows DHS
to use virtually any quack they choose, licensed or not, under contract
with DHS and totally dependent on DHS for their livelihood to evaluate
and treat you for your obvious mental condition of not liking DHS or the
way they operate. Sort of reminds me of the Soviet Union. It was Nikita
Khrushchev, former leader of the Soviet Union who said, “There are no
dissidents in the Soviet Union, there are only mentally ill people.” Are
you aware that it is DHS, The Courts and the District Attorney’s Office
that recommend to which consortia of attorneys the 2.6 million dollar
contract per year to defend parents against DHS, goes to? That means
both DHS and the District Attorney get to select the attorneys they will
be facing in court for the next two years and you were wondering how any
group of attorneys could lose every termination case they took? Silly
you.
To see the Office of Public Defenders results of
their investigation back in 2005 into the public defenders in Klamath
County, go here.
Pay particular attention to page 16 and on in that
report on Klamath County.
Clearly these lawyers who often meet with their
clients only, less than five minutes before representing them in matters
that will result in that parent losing their children, at least in
Klamath County and elsewhere in Oregon are in my opinion at the bottom
of the barrel of attorneys in Oregon and elsewhere. How else could a
lawyer do little to nothing and still make over a hundred thousand a
year working a court appointed attorney who secretly does whatever DHS
tells them to do?
This gives rise to the biggest question of all.
How is it that anybody accused of stealing something worth $250 has an
absolute right to a trial in front of a jury, BUT, if the state is
attempting to terminate your rights as a parent and if successful, that
means you will never see them again, is set up where you have no right
to a trial by jury? That is really nuts. Having jury trials would
eliminate stupid and revealing statements by judges, such as we have
documented, where a female judge in Klamath Falls has said to DHS
workers on the stand, facing opposing council, “If their questions make
you uncomfortable, you don’t have to answer them.” Or judge who has had
every one, three in total, of her closest nieces hired right after
obtaining their 4 year degree, by DHS in Klamath County and that naughty
judge fails to let those appearing in front of her on DHS matters, about
her nieces all working for DHS. To tell those appearing front of her
would give those parent grounds for recuing or removing that judge from
being able to hear their case. How about a judge that spoke to the
foster mother about the case against the bio parents via letters and
later met and talked to the local state senator and his wife about that
same case involving termination of a father’s Parental Rights and when
the father tried to bring up that forbidden communications, ex-parte
communications, in motions, that same judge refused to even allow the
proof to be brought into his courtroom? That really happened. Another
judge, who was rumored to have had had an one night affair with a man
who has a current case in front of her, at first denied that she was
receiving and writing letters to that man while he was in prison and had
a case pending in front of her. Later, after her letters to the man,
while he was in prison, were produced in court, she admitted to it,
writing letters to him, not the other part, of course, but claimed it
was was no big deal and still refused to take herself off of the case.
Here’s something weird, if you live in Klamath
County and have been to court there against DHS, have you noticed how
almost every one of the DHS female employees have the exact same hair
style as the Program manager there? They virtually all wear their hair
in a “Bob.” It is very strange, like Children of the Corn or something!
We have found transcripts with thousands of major
errors in them. The transcripts don’t match the audio tapes of the
trial. All of the errors favor DHS and their attorney, the Attorney
General’s Office of the state of Oregon. There are also hundreds of
pages of certified transcripts that have disappeared and were never
provided to the Court of Appeals by any of the parents last five
attorneys, nor the Attorney General’s Office that represents DHS,
despite the appeals court having specifically asked for those reports.
I am currently making a film that deals with the
number of children who are murdered while in DHS/CPS custody and
guardianship. Most of the principle photography is finished and we are
at the end of the editing process for the promotional film about the
fulll length film that will follow. This film focuses on the murders of
child that occur AFTER CPS has taken the children from their parents,
supposedly investigated the placement home and the people where they are
going to put the kids and run background checks on those foster care
providers. Then, despite warnings of abuse from family members and
neighbors, CPS does little to really investigate their placements in
this country and over 1,000 children per year wind up abused, raped,
tortured and ultimately murdered. That is three a day. Every day this
insanity continues, three more innocent children will be killed while in
DHS/CPS guardianship, in homes where DHS/CPS placed them. No parent
could have a record like DHS’ or they would be in prison and sterilized.
Over 1,000 children murdered while in DHS custody each year in the USA.
That is an equal number of child deaths to drowning in swimming pools
each year, which is one of the highest areas of fatalities for children
in this county. If you or someone you know has had a child that died
while in DHS/CPS custody, I invite you to contact me as soon as possible
so we can discuss if you want that story out for others in America to
know about. It is a way to effect change in what has to be the most
insane area of government activity that exists today. These are little
4,5 and 6 year old children. They need your help. We all need your help
through your story. We are NOT looking for any donations at all, nor are
we asking you to march in front of a bunch of uncaring legislators and a
governor who is up to his eyeballs in all of this.
I know Chrytal Shuggars, who posted on this blog.
I helped investigate her case and what she wrote is true, but there is a
lot more to her story. She appears in the film, as does the former
caseworker who worked on her case until she was fired for supposedly
blowing the whistle on DHS in Klamath Falls. The film being made
currently, contains detailed interviews with parents whose children were
tortured and murdered while in foster care or after DHS put the child
back with the biological parent, but still under DHS/CPS guardianship,
despite clear warnings that the child was in danger and those kids wound
up murdered. We have doctors, forensic experts, former caseworkers and
others appearing in that film, along with court transcripts and the
transcriptionist and audio recordings of those court proceedings. Some
of those offer shocking proof of just how corrupt the judicial system is
at least in Klamath County. This subject of this film has been being
investigated for over two years and is very well documented. For
support, the film has some major celebrities from the entertainment
world who have thrown their generous support behind the exposure of what
really goes on in our courts and within DHS/CPS. That full length film
will be released in the winter of 2009 - 2010 and a short film promoting
that film is due for release in the next month. August 2009. Copies of
the promotional film will be made available for downloading for free and
we encourage you to send a copy to your state senator or representative,
newspapers, other reporters and web sites. No profit is being made from
the film and all proceeds will go into a non profit foundation set up by
the celebrities who are appearing in the film. We are not, after all,
money motivated as DHS/CPS is motivated.
Check this site and others to find out the exact
day the promotional film will be released and for the proper link. .
Again, there is no charge of any kind for downloading that short
promotional film.
Low-rider jeans that are too
low? Call 911. Failing to shovel that snow-covered sidewalk? Book 'em.
In America today, lawmakers are criminalizing innocent behavior at
an alarming rate and undermining our criminal justice system.
Texas Rep. Wayne Smith is tired of hearing about
parents missing meetings with their children's teachers. His proposed
solution is simple: Prosecute such parents as criminals. In Louisiana,
state Sen. Derrick Shepherd is tired of seeing teenagers wearing popular
low-rider pants that show their undergarments so he would like to
criminally charge future teenagers who are caught "riding low."
Across the USA, legislators are criminalizing
everything from spitting on a school bus to speaking on a cell phone
while driving. Criminalizing bad behavior has become the rage among
politicians, who view such action as a type of legislative exclamation
point demonstrating the seriousness of their cause. As a result, new
crimes are proliferating at an alarming rate, and we risk becoming a
nation of criminals where carelessness or even rudeness is enough to
secure a criminal record.
There was a time when having a criminal record
meant something. Indeed, it was the social stigma or shame of such
charges that deterred many people from "a life of crime." In both
England and the USA, there was once a sharp distinction between criminal
and negligent conduct; the difference between the truly wicked and the
merely stupid.
Legislators, however, discovered that
criminalization was a wonderful way to outdo one's opponents on popular
issues. Thus, when deadbeat dads became an issue, legislators rushed to
make missing child payments a crime rather than rely on civil judgments.
When cell phone drivers became a public nuisance, a new crime was born.
Unnecessary horn honking, speaking loudly on a cell phone and driving
without a seat belt are only a few of the new crimes. If you care enough
about child support, littering, or abandoned pets, you are expected to
care enough to make their abuse a crime.
Consider the budding criminal career of Kay
Leibrand. The 61-year-old grandmother lived a deceptively quiet life in
Palo Alto, Calif., until the prosecutors outed her as a habitual
horticultural offender. It appears that she allowed her hedge bushes to
grow more than 2 feet high a crime in the city. Battling cancer,
Leibrand had allowed her shrubbery to grow into a criminal enterprise.
(After her arraignment and shortly before her jury trial, she was
allowed to cut down her bushes and settle the case.)
Of course, it is better to be a criminal
horticulturalist than a serial snacker. In 2000, on her way home from
her junior high school in Washington, D.C., 12-year-old Ansche Hedgepeth
grabbed some french fries and ate them as she went into the train
station. In Washington, it is a crime to "consume food or drink" in a
Metrorail facility. An undercover officer arrested her, searched her and
confiscated her shoelaces.
Running out of adult targets, many state laws
pursue the toddler and preteen criminal element. In Texas, children have
been charged for chewing gum or, in one case, simply removing the lid
from a fire alarm. Dozens of kids have been charged with everything from
terrorism to criminal threats for playing with toy guns or drawing
violent doodles in school.
In the federal system, Congress has been in a
virtual criminalization frenzy. There are more than 4,000 crimes and
roughly 10,000 regulations with criminal penalties in the federal system
alone. Just last year, Congress made it a crime to sell horse meat for
human consumption � a common practice in Europe where it is considered a
delicacy. Congress has also criminalized such things as disruptive
conduct by animal activists and using the image of Smokey Bear or Woodsy
Owl or the 4-H club insignia without authorization.
The ability to deter negligence with criminal
charges has always been questioned by academics. Negligent people are,
by definition, acting in a thoughtless, unpremeditated, or careless way.
Nevertheless, prosecutors will often stretch laws to make a popular
point � even when the perpetrators have suffered greatly and shown
complete remorse.
In 2002, Kevin Kelly was charged criminally in
Manassas, Va., when his daughter, less than 2 years old, was left in the
family van and died of hyperthermia. With his wife in Ireland with
another daughter, Kelly watched over their 12 other children. He relied
on his teenage daughters to help unload the van and did not realize the
mistake until it was too late.
The suggestion that people like Kelly need a
criminal conviction to think about the safety of their children is
absurd. Kelly was widely viewed as a loving father, who was devastated
by the loss. The conviction only magnified the tragedy for this family.
(Though the prosecutors sought jail time, Kelly was sentenced to seven
years probation, with one day in jail a year to think about his
daughter's death.)
The criminalization of America might come as a
boon for politicians, but it comes at considerable cost for citizens and
society. For citizens, a criminal record can affect everything from
employment to voting to child custody � not to mention ruinous legal
costs.
Yet, it now takes only a fleeting mistake to cross
the line into criminal conduct. In Virginia, when a child accused Dawn
McCann of swearing at a bus stop, she was charged criminally � as have
been other people accused of the crime of public profanity.
Our insatiable desire to turn everything into a
crime is creating a Gulag America with 714 incarcerated persons per
100,000 the highest rate in the world. Millions of people are
charged each year with new criminal acts that can stretch from
first-degree murder to failing to shovel their sidewalks.
We can find better ways to deal with runaway
bushes, castaway pets, or even potty-mouth problems. Congress and the
states should create independent commissions to review their laws in
order to decriminalize negligent conduct, limiting criminal charges to
true crimes and true criminals. In the end, a crime means nothing if
anyone can be a criminal.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of
Public Interest Law at George Washington University and a member of USA
TODAY's board of contributors.
This is a statement that was read over the PA system
at the football game atRoane
County High School , Kingston , Tennessee , by school
Principal, Jody McLeod
"It has always been the custom at Roane County High
School football games, to say a prayer and play the
National Anthem, to honor God and Country."
Due to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court, I am told
that saying a Prayer is a violation of Federal Case Law.
As I understand the law at this time, I can use this
public facility to approve of sexual perversion and call
it "an alternate life style," and if someone is
offended, that's OK.
I can use it to condone sexual promiscuity, by
dispensing condoms and calling it, "safe sex....." If
someone is offended, that's OK.
I can even use this public facility to present the
merits of killing an unborn baby as a "viable! means of
birth control." If someone is offended, no problem...
I can designate a school day as "Earth Day" and involve
students in activities to worship religiously and praise
the goddess "Mother Earth" and call it "ecology.."
I can use literature, videos and presentations in the
classroom that depicts people with strong, traditional
Christian convictions as "simple minded" and "ignorant"
and call it "enlightenment.."
However, if anyone uses this facility to honor GOD and
to ask HIM to Bless this event with safety and good
sportsmanship, then Federal Case Law is violated..
This appears to be inconsistent at best, and at worst,
diabolical.
Apparently, we are to be tolerant of everything and
anyone, except GOD and HIS Commandments.
Nevertheless , as a school principal, I frequently ask
staff and students to abide by rules with which they do
not necessarily agree. For me to do otherwise would be
inconsistent at best, and at worst, hypocritical... I
suffer from that affliction enough unintentionally. I
certainly do not need to add an intentional
transgression.
For this reason, I shall "Render unto Caesar that which
is Caesar's," and refrain from praying at this time.
"However, if you feel inspired to honor, praise and
thank GOD and ask HIM, in the name of JESUS, to Bless
this event, please feel free to do so.
As far as I know, that's not against the law----yet."
One by one, the people in the stands bowed their heads,
held hands with one another and began to pray.
They prayed in the stands.. They prayed in the team
huddles. They prayed at the concession stand and they
prayed in the Announcer's Box!
The only place they didn't pray was in the Supreme Court
of the United States of America- the Seat of "Justice"
in the "one nation, under GOD."
Somehow, Kingston , Tennessee Remembered what so many
have forgotten. We are given the Freedom OF Religion,
not the FreedomFROM
Religion.. Praise GOD that HIS remnant remains!
JESUS said, "If you are ashamed of ME before men, then I
will be ashamed of you before MY FATHER.."
If you are not ashamed, pass this on . I'm
not one bit ashamed to pass this on, Are you?
Indeed not!
Snopes
Verified as TRUE
http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/mcloud.asp
This course is highly recommended for ALL foster and adoptive parents.
Curriculum:
When we first enter the world of foster parenting, we
are excited, enthusiastic, naive, willing and eager to meet the
challenges that face us. We plunge into this endeavor with the
expectations of making a better life for a child. How many times
throughout our foster parenting "career" do we hear the phrase "at risk
children"? Do we ever hear "at risk foster parents"? The painful truth
is that foster parents are at risk daily for allegations to be brought
against them It isn't a matter of "if"...it is a matter of "when". This
course teaches methods that will greatly reduce the risk of being
accused of an allegation.
Course covers (but not limited to):
Placement information
Importance of knowing regulations
How & what to document
Foster parent responsibilities
Children's records
Child's emotional & nurturing needs
Child's physical needs
Child's educational needs
Child's recreational needs
Working with the agency
Working with child's biological family
Teaching/Discipline tasks
Foster parent do's and don't's
Foster care safety checklist
Importance of support groups
Course goals:
To provide caregivers information and techniques
needed to assist with the prevention of allegations
To provide social services workers information and
an understanding of what caregivers are susceptible to and how to
assist them prevent allegations
Course presenters: Fred Leiner, Ph.D & Barbara Leiner