State Director

  Washington State Links
Become an Advocate for your State
Learn More

Quick Start
for Foster Parents
Falsely Accused


  1. Standing in the Shadow
    of the Law

  2. The DO’s and DON’T’s
    Falsely Accused

  3. The Little Known “DIRTY TRICKS”

Home | What You Can Do | Facts | State Chapters | Resources | When An Allegation Is Made | Our Support Group
State Reference Links

"For more than a decade we’ve watched as children under Child Protective Services' care have been abused and beaten to death, foster parents have been alienated, and dozens of lawsuits have been filed," she said. "All attempts to force the Children’s Administration to make improvements and protect Washington children have failed."
(Sen. Val Stevens, 39th District Legislator rebukes children’s agency, The Columbian, June 24, 2008)

Senator Pam Roach
 Olympia Office:
 202 Irv Newhouse Building
 PO Box 40431
Olympia, WA 98504-0431
(360) 786-7660
 Fax: (360) 786-7173

Go To Senator Pam Roach's Blog Spot


In The News

Legislative Update

March 8, 2010

Foster Care Justice Alliance

Defending the Rights of the Child




"This bill is all about paying attention to children who have formed relationships with their caregivers, and making sure when they are being moved to another setting, that attention is paid to the fact that they have lived with the family for a year or more.  This bill requires that when a child has lived with a caregiver for a year, and is being moved to another placement, that caregiver may request a hearing of the court, to review that placement and assure that this is in fact in the best interest of the child.  This is, I think, a bill that really is in the best interest of children and I urge your support."

Rep. Ruth Kagi, 32nd District, ELCS Chair

House Floor Debate on SB 6416, March 4, 2010





HB 2735, to notify foster youth of their rights under current law, has made final passage out of the legislature and on to the governor!  It was touch and go there for a while, right up to the last hour before the deadline to get out of the Senate.  But your senators and the senate leadership listened to all the calls and e-mails and voted it out.  It passed unanimous so you can thank all of them.  Thank you!





The Senate Bills 6416 and 6730 have made it out of the House, where they were amended, so they return to the Senate for concurrence.  The legislative session ends this Thursday, March 11.  There is no time to waste.  Please contact your senator in support of the amended bills.


We believe that across the board the language as passed out of the House was better than what was in the underlying bills.  Since the bills had overlapping language, and sections that moved back and forth between the two bills, it is easier to give a side-by-side analysis of the Senate and House versions of the two bills combined:



House language

Senate language

If a child is moved from a home where the child has lived for a year or more, the foster parent or relative caregiver has 10 days to petition the court on the issue of placement only, unless the child is being moved to a court-approved permanent placement, such as return home or adoption.

Only relative caregivers may petition the court, and only if a birth parent agrees to the petition.


Does not prevent the caregiver from petitioning the court if the child has been returned to a different parent or moved to an adoptive home.

Requires DSHS to give relative caregivers the same 5-day notice that they are already required to give foster parents before moving a child.

Same effect as House language.

DSHS to report annually on placement changes for children who have resided in the home of a foster family, relative caregiver, or other suitable person for twelve consecutive months or longer, including the reasons for changing the placements of those children.

No such provision.

Relatives, caregivers, and others with significant relationship to the child allowed to submit testimony in writing to the court, and the court is required to consider it when making placement decisions.

No such provision.

When a child has been placed with and resided in the home of a foster family, relative caregiver, or other suitable person for twelve consecutive months or longer, the notice required must be provided in writing and must specify the reasons for changing the child's placement.

Only relative caregivers are given notice in writing specifying the reasons for moving the child.

There is no provision that creates presumptions about a particular placement.


However, current law requires relatives to be considered first for placement, and absent good cause, the wishes of the birth parent regarding placement are to be followed.

Creates a presumption that any placement with a relative selected by the parent is a good one.

Guardians Ad Litem are required to call CPS if a child reveals to them that he/she has been abused.

Investigation of abuse is excluded from the duties of Guardians Ad Litem.



We support the amended language for these reasons:


  • Every child deserves to be protected.  The proper focus is on the well being and best interests of the child.  Creating special rights for persons who are not parties to the case that are not based on the child's well-being is dangerous ground.  Unless all children are protected, based on their right to well-being, the effect is to treat the child as chattel than can be inherited.
  • The presumption that a placement is a good one if it was selected by a  parent, who has already been determined by the court to have abused or neglected this same child, is tenuous at best.  This prevents social workers from doing social work, and limits the court's ability to find what is in the child's best interest.
  • If a petition to the court must be approved by the very parent who is alleged to have harmed this child already, it seriously biases the information given to the court.  Further it renders the entire provision pointless, since the parent already has a paid attorney and the right to petition the court at any time.  It is much better to say that the caregiver can only petition if the child is being moved from one out-of-home placement to another.
  • The original language would not allow grandparents or siblings that are not the current caregiver to submit evidence to the court and have it considered.
  • The original language does not hold DSHS accountable for the trends in the aggregate data, shown by an annual report on children that have been moved.



ACTION ITEM: Contact your senator in SUPPORT of the HOUSE VERSIONS of SB 6416 and SB 6730 to protect children in all foster care placements from unnecessary moves.  It is urgent that you do so today.  The bills are likely to go into conference soon to reconcile the differences.  The legislative session will be over in a few days, and it will be too late.  Your senator needs to hear from you.


If you don't know who your senator is, click here:







Senator Randi Becker

District 2

(360) 786-7602

Senator Don Benton

District 17

(360) 786-7632

Senator Jean Berkey

District 38

(360) 786-7674

Senator Dale Brandland

District 42

(360) 786-7682

Senator Lisa Brown

District 3

(360) 786-7604

Senator Mike Carrell

District 28

(360) 786-7654

Senator Jerome Delvin

District 8

(360) 786-7614

Senator Tracey Eide

District 30

(360) 786-7662

Senator Darlene Fairley

District 32

(360) 786-7662

Senator Rosa Franklin

District 29

(360) 786-7656

Senator Karen Fraser

District 22

(360) 786-7642

Senator Randy Gordon

District 41

(360) 786-7641

Senator James Hargrove

District 24

(360) 786-7646

Senator Brian Hatfield

District 19

(360) 786-7636

Senator Mary Margaret Haugen

District 10

(360) 786-7618

Senator Mike Hewitt

District 16

(360) 786-7630

Senator Steve Hobbs

District 44

(360) 786-7686

Senator Janéa Holmquist

District 13

(360) 786-7624

Senator Jim Honeyford

District 15

(360) 786-7684

Senator Ken Jacobsen

District 46

(360) 786-7690

Senator Jim Kastama

District 25

(360) 786-7648

Senator Claudia Kauffman

District 47

(360) 786-7692

Senator Karen Keiser

District 33

(360) 786-7664

Senator Derek Kilmer

District 26

(360) 786-7650

Senator Curtis King

District 14

(360) 786-7626

Senator Adam Kline

District 37

(360) 786-7688

Senator Jeanne Kohl-Welles

District 36

(360) 786-7670

Senator Chris Marr

District 6

(360) 786-7610

Senator Rosemary McAuliffe

District 1

(360) 786-7600

Senator Bob McCaslin

District 4

(360) 786-7606

Senator Joe McDermott

District 34

(360) 786-7667

Senator Bob Morton

District 7

(360) 786-7612

Senator Ed Murray

District 43

(360) 786-7628

Senator Eric Oemig

District 45

(360) 786-7672

Senator Linda Evans Parlette

District 12

(360) 786-7622

Senator Cheryl Pflug

District 5

(360) 786-7608

Senator Margarita Prentice

District 11

(360) 786-7616

Senator Craig Pridemore

District 49

(360) 786-7696

Senator Kevin Ranker

District 40

(360) 786-7678

Senator Debbie Regala

District 27

(360) 786-7652

Senator Pam Roach

District 31

(360) 786-7660

Senator Phil Rockefeller

District 23

(360) 786-7644

Senator Mark Schoesler

District 9

(360) 786-7620

Senator Tim Sheldon

District 35

(360) 786-7668

Senator Paull Shin

District 21

(360) 786-7640

Senator Val Stevens

District 39

(360) 786-7676

Senator Dan Swecker

District 20

(360) 786-7638

Senator Rodney Tom

District 48

(360) 786-7694

Senator Joseph Zarelli

District 18

(360) 786-7634



Thank you again.

Any Good News for Your State email me


Senator Pam Roach announces Public Hearing on DCFS ~ April 16, 2009

Washington State Senate
Sen. Pam Roach
For immediate release                                           For interviews contact:
April 13, 2009                                                  Sen. Pam Roach (360) 786-7660
Senator Pam Roach announces Public Hearing on DCFS
Olympia…Sen. Pam Roach, (R-rural Auburn), has set April 16, 2009 as the date for a special legislative hearing on “DCFS: Agency Problems.” The meeting begins at 12 noon in the John A. Cherberg Building on the Olympia Campus, Senate Hearing Room 1.
“The Division of Children and Family Services is fraught with problems,” said Roach. “They fail to protect children by not following the law requiring placement with good, biological relatives and too often do not remove children in harm’s way. They have systemic problems with inaccurate reporting on the ground level.”
In January, State Ombudsman, Mary Meinig, released a scathing report citing deficiencies in the department. The report states that the ombudsman reviewed more than 150 child fatalities or near fatalities during its two year study. DCFS had an increase in citizen complaints against the department, often used foster providers who had not been given background checks, and had a 62% increase since 2006 in issues involving inappropriate permanency plans or delays in permanency.
“This report finds that our children are in danger,” added Roach, “and nothing is changing at this agency to turn its unsafe culture around.”
Another report released by Stevens County Prosecuting Attorney, Tim Rasmussen, who will attend the meeting, finds serious problems within the department. It states that relatives of the child are not notified or considered for placement, and that DCFS workers have developed a pattern of “shopping” for health care providers and counselors supportive of their objectives. 
“I have come to believe a pattern of misconduct exists within the local department that has resulted in corruption,” reports Rasmussen. “The department uses the confidentiality requirement as a shield to disclosure and discovery of misconduct by the workers.”
“The report from Stevens County is indicative of a system wide problem that must be addressed,” warned Roach. “The purpose of the hearing is to identify specific organizational problems within the agency in hopes of giving guidance for future, more lawful interactions with the public.”
“Simply put, this system needs help saving children,” said Roach. “Money isn’t the answer. The answer is accountability and lawful involvement.”
“There is a growing degree of interest by legislators regarding the outcomes within DCFS,” Roach added.
“We need to shine light on this agency, and the public needs to be involved in order to correct its deficiencies.”
For more information contact Senator Pam Roach at (360) 786-7660 or via e-mail at
Cheryl Marshall
Session Aide to Senator Pam Roach
202 Newhouse Building
PO Box 40431
Olympia, WA  98504

Back to Top

Little Girl Poca And Our Foster Care System
May 2009

This five part story – one part a day all this week – tries to look behind the headlines to explain:

  1. The fight between DSHS and the foster family that wants to keep Poca;
  2. Important questions that have gone mostly overlooked in all the media stories about the case;
  3. Why reunification with biological parents – most of them deeply damaged individuals – is the primary goal for DSHS and the Courts in these cases;
  4. What dealing with DSHS is like from a family law attorneys’ perspective; and
  5. Why all the media outcry on this case may not end up helping little girl Poca.

Back to Top


Legislative Update ~ March 10, 2009


Foster Care Justice Alliance

Defending the Rights of the Child

Legislative Update




·       SB 5431: Children returning to foster care return to the same foster family

·       SB 5510: Encouraging Early Engagement of All Parenting Resources (Senate version)

·       SB 5811: Strengthens the Ombudsman (and other issues - see below)



·       HB 1782: Encouraging Early Engagement of All Parenting Resources (House version)



·       SB 5803: Informing Adoptive Parents of the Limitations of Adoption Support





·       Contact your senators in Senate Rules: Please bring SB 5803 to a vote. 
       If this bill doesn’t get to the Senate floor by Thursday, it’s dead.  Prospective adoptive parents deserve honesty.

·       Contact your both your representatives: Please vote YES on HB 1782





Thanks to you, our bills are moving forward, but still need your help.  The deadline to get out of the house of origin is this Thursday, March 12.  Bills that do not make this deadline are dead.  All our bills made it out of committee, but we still need to help SB 5803 get to the Senate floor for a vote.  The senators on the list below are the ones that can make it happen.  There are lots of bills competing for attention; the ones that make it are the ones whose supporters make the most noise.  That's where you come in.


SB 5803 requires the department to inform prospective adoptive parents of the limitations of adoption support, in particular, that it will not provide for residential care services.  Too many parents that adopt high needs, high risk children are not adequately informed of the risks involved.  While most children will not require such intensive care, for those that do, it can bankrupt their family.  Contact your lawmakers, and tell them that adoptive parents deserve to know the truth before they adopt.


If you don’t know who your legislators are, use the district finder:  Or just call the toll-free number 1-800-562-6000.  The operators will help you figure out your district.  Ask to pass a message to all your legislators to vote YES on HB 1782, SB 5803, and to support the Foster Justice legislation.


You’ll notice that this e-mail has been sent from our new e-mail list server, using the e-mail address.  The address is being phased out, although mail sent there will be forwarded to our new address for a time.  This upgrade means that individuals can subscribe/unsubscribe to these mails without requiring me to do it manually.  As our direct subscriber list nears 2000 and our indirect subscribers already top 5000, this was long overdue!  You can add/remove yourself from the list directly on our website:


Thank you!


Gary Malkasian

FCJA President



Senator                                   Phone                          E-mail

Franklin, Rosa                         (360) 786-7656 

Hewitt, Mike                           (360) 786-7630 

Brown, Lisa                            (360) 786-7604 

Eide, Tracey                            (360) 786-7658 

Fraser, Karen                         (360) 786-7642 

Haugen, Mary Margaret          (360) 786-7618 

Kauffman, Claudia                  (360) 786-7692 

Keiser, Karen                         (360) 786-7664 

King, Curtis                             (360) 786-7626 

Kohl-Welles, Jeanne               (360) 786-7670 

Marr, Chris                             (360) 786-7610 

Murray, Ed                              (360) 786-7628 

Parlette, Linda Evans             (360) 786-7622 

Pridemore, Craig                     (360) 786-7696 

Regala, Debbie                       (360) 786-7652 

Schoesler, Mark                     (360) 786-7620 

Stevens, Val                            (360) 786-7676 

Zarelli, Joseph                       (360) 786-7634 




Don’t know who your representatives are? Click here:

All e-mail addresses:


Toll Free Legislative Hotline: 1-800-562-6000

FCJA 24-hour Message Line: 1-484-288-4364

Foster Care Justice Alliance, P.O. Box 233, Woodinville, WA 98072-0233

Join Us in Facebook:


Foster Care Justice Alliance is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.  Tax deductable donations can be made online, by mail, or in person at any Bank of America branch (WA State):



Legislative Update ~ January 28, 2009

Foster Care Justice Alliance

Defending the Rights of the Child

Legislative Update

January 28, 2009 

Contents of Update



“DSHS has no standards for where they place children. They have no conscience when leaving a child in harms way (black eyes and guns). They are completely out of touch with the thinking of ‘normal’ people and they really are not accountable to anyone so make no one accountable to them. The ones at the top do not discipline poor performance of DSHS employees or contracted agencies and pass off decision making to those lower on the totem pole.”

Senator Pam Roach, 31st District

August 28, 2008

Pam Roach Report, Blogspot



·       Come to the rally Thursday, Feb. 5, 12 noon in front of the Capitol Rotunda in Olympia!

·       Call your legislators:

o      Ask them to support Early Permanency, Continuity of Care, and findings of the Foster Care Justice Alliance Think Tank Report

o      Ask them to restore funding for CASA, Medicare, and other vital services for foster kids

·       Volunteer to be a court observer

Back to Contents of Update



The budget is the big story this session.  There is a $6 billion deficit.  As required by law, the governor delivered a balanced budget to the legislature – balanced by slashing vital services, such as the Washington State CASA, Foster Care Health Centers, housing assistance for foster care youth aging out of the system, and Medicare treatment.  Bill introductions have been much slower this session; anything that costs money is unlikely to get much support.  Hard choices have to be made.  The challenge this session is to hang onto funding for those things that are vital.

Back to Contents of Update



On November 1st, 2008, we brought together experts in law, mental health, attachment, and child welfare to discuss foster care and make specific policy recommendations.  The report can be downloaded from our website, Think Tank Report.doc.


The report has been published and distributed, the legislative session is underway, and the first legislation proposed by us since incorporating has been introduced in the Senate by Senator Val Stevens, 39th District.

Back to Contents of Update



RALLY IN OLYMPIA – Thursday, FEB. 5, 12:00 NOON

Next Thursday, we are joining Senator Pam Roach in front of the Capitol Rotunda in Olympia in a rally calling for greater accountability from DSHS.  Come join us, show your support, and help get the word out.  We need hundreds of foster parents and other concerned citizens to show up in support of our foster kids.  Join us!

Back to Contents of Update



The horror stories continue.  Foster children placed in high risk situations.  Foster parents who complain are subject to retaliation.  I have to echo what Senator Roach said in the quote above; some decisions defy the logic that any normal thinking person would have.  We need your support to continue this fight.  Please consider donating to the Foster Care Justice Alliance.  We are a 501(c)(3) organization.  Donations are tax deductable.

We also need volunteers to be impartial court observers.  If you can volunteer a couple hours to go to court in your local district, to observe a dependency case, please contact me right away.  We need court observers in every county.


Don’t know who your representatives are? Click here:

All e-mail addresses:

Toll Free Legislative Hotline: 1.800.562.6000

Find Me in Facebook:

 Back to Contents of Update


SB 5431 Regarding placement of a child returning to out-of-home care


Status: Referred to Human Services & Corrections

If a child returns home, and then returns to foster care, this bill requires the department to place the child with the same foster family, if the family is willing and available, and in the best interest of the child.


ACTION ITEM: Thank Sen. Stevens for sponsoring this bill and thank Sen. Hargrove and the entire Senate Committee for co-sponsoring it!  When the all the committee members sign on as co-sponsors, that’s usually a pretty good indication a bill will pass the committee.  Great first start for the first FCJA bill.  Ask Sen. Hargrove to please schedule this bill for a hearing.

Senator Val Stevens                (360) 786-7676 

Senator James Hargrove         (360) 786-7646


Back to Contents of Update


SB 5510 Encouraging Early Engagement: Regarding notification in dependency matters


Status: Referred to Human Services & Corrections


Supported by the Child Welfare Advocacy Coalition

  • Modifies the Notification of Dependency (foster care) to inform the parents that both need to be consistently involved in services from the start, even if one wants the other to have custody, or risk permanent loss of parental rights.

  • Adds a Warning Notification after six months of no contact to repeat that permanent loss of parental rights may result from no contact

  • Modifies the Notification of Termination of Parental Rights to include 15 months of no contact as an aggravating circumstance not requiring reasonable efforts, if the parent had reasonable opportunity for contact and was properly notified.


Download our position paper here:


ACTION ITEM: Thank Sen. Stevens for sponsoring this bill and thank Sen. Hargrove, Sen. Swecker, and Sen. Shin for co-sponsoring it!  Thank the senators, and ask Sen. Hargrove to please schedule it for a hearing.

Senator James Hargrove         (360) 786-7646 

Senator Paull Shin                   (360) 786-7640 

Senator Val Stevens                (360) 786-7676 

Senator Dan Swecker              (360) 786-7638 


Back to Contents of Update


Continuity of Care and the Importance of Psychological Relationships


Status: Not yet introduced


We are seeking a statutory right to intervene for visitation, placement, and child safety for children that are languishing in foster care.  Children form very deep bonds, often in the only home they have ever known, and yet the child has no right to maintain that bond.  We have seen children removed from foster homes as retaliation because the foster parent complained about the case – and the foster parent has no recourse to protect the child.  We believe that intervention is a last resort, which may be appropriate in certain circumstances:


  • The child is languishing in foster care

  • The child’s due process rights are not being protected

  • The privacy of the birth parent is respected, including limited records access, with personal information and unfounded allegations removed

  • The intervener has no involvement in parental rights

  • Circumstances detrimental to the child exist if relief is not granted


This is a very complex issue.  Read more about it in our think tank report: Think Tank

Download our position paper here:


ACTION ITEM: Talk to your legislators about the bonds children form in long term foster care, and the importance of psychological parents.  Ask them to support the FCJA Think Tank Report.


Back to Contents of Update


HB 1183/SB 5609 Concerning legal representation of children in dependency proceedings


House Status: Heard by the Judiciary Committee

Senate Status: Referred to Human Services & Corrections


Supported by the Child Welfare Advocacy Coalition

Requires the court to determine if a foster child over the age of 12 needs an attorney.  Under current law, a child 12 or older can request an attorney.  Even if a child doesn’t request one, the court can still order one for the child now.  This bill would simply require the court to consider and make a determination.

An attorney can help a child stand up for their rights, when they are being moved unnecessarily, or when they haven’t had visitation with siblings.  Foster Justice supports this bill.  But attorneys cost money, and anything that will cost money is going to have a hard time this session.



Ask Sen. Hargrove to please schedule SB 5609 for a hearing.

Thank Rep. Pedersen for hearing HB 1183 – please PASS! 

Senator James Hargrove         (360) 786-7646 

Rep. Jamie Pedersen               (360) 786-7826 


Back to Contents of Update


HB 1607/SB 5477 Visitation rights for grandparents.


House Status: Referred to the Judiciary Committee

Senate Status: Referred to Human Services & Corrections


Proposed by GROWS (Grandparents Rights of Washington State)

Allows grandparents to petition the court for visitation with a grandchild, if:


  • a substantial relationship exists between the grandparent and the child

  • the relationship was actively encouraged by the parent

  • contact has unreasonably been denied

  • the child would suffer harm if contact is not awarded

  • contact is in the child’s best interest


This is a complex issue that does not relate directly to foster care, however, many of the kids affected by this are foster kids, and many of them would have become foster kids if the grandparents had not stepped in.  Although this bill speaks to any grandparent with a substantial relationship, my main concern is for the grandparents that have become the primary caregivers for years at a time through an informal arrangement, and then lose all contact with the child when the natural parent returns.  There’s no doubt in my mind the child is harmed by that, and it happens far too often.  This ties in to our own proposal for continuity of care, and in fact a representative from GROWS participated in our think tank.



Ask Sen. Hargrove to please schedule SB 5477 for a hearing.

Ask Rep. Pedersen to please schedule HB 1607 for a hearing. 

Senator James Hargrove         (360) 786-7646 

Rep. Jamie Pedersen               (360) 786-7826 


Back to Contents of Update




Toll Free Legislative Hotline: 1.800.562.6000

Find out who are your legislators:

E-mail addresses for all lawmakers: 

FCJA Facebook Page:

Back to Contents of Update


Letter to WA Representative

Hello Rep Kagi,

I would like to discuss some recent developments with family rights here in the State of Washington and around the country. We are joining forces with all persons affected by Parens Patriae to include parents, extended family, foster parents and father's and mother's rights groups. While this is a difficult endeavor due to various divisions, the focus will be on challenging the system with the unified goals and commonalities that each are suffering under in family courts and through CPS. I am meeting with a national foster parenting interest group next week and we will be discussing ways to do this.

I have several areas that I will be addressing this legislative session but there are five that I will share at this time. The first is making the DSHS/CPS head an elected position.  The affect on families with little to no due process rights, weak evidence laws and unbridled CPS power needs to stop. Our elected officials cannot be trusted to appoint to this position anymore.

The second is the free use of our Social Security money to pay for the destruction of the family and Civil Rights violations. Perhaps those in elected positions have found ways to make money and won't need the extra government support, but many of us who are close to retirement do need it and we are requiring that this funding and the state acceptance of this funding stop and to find alternative funding for necessary child protection. The Federal Government is borrowing this money and has no intention of paying it back. This constant borrowing affects only older persons of limited means and is discriminatory.

This brings me to the third. Child Protective Services should be restricted to misdemeanor and felony actions only. The rest should be delved out to private industry funded by foundations and other means. This can greatly reduce CPS staffing and shift the emphasis from child removal to family preservation.

The fourth is regarding mandatory reporters and who they have to report to. Right now they have two options - one CPS and the other the police or face legal actions against them. With the advent of change, the other option would be family preservation programs for non-legal issues.

The fifth is the constant screening out or ignoring of extended family seeking third party custody or guardianship. There is a different set of criteria for extended family than foster. Foster parent's character defects are frequently ignored while extended family go under a microscope with every issue made out to be a major concern. The stated percentages of extended family placement are not correct because they leave out unsubstantiated removals. The percentages of family care is much lower. 

Jan D. Smith
Washington State Extended Families

Washington Foster Parents Unite, Fight Lawmakers

Day to Day, December 18, 2006 · A group of foster parents in Washington state became the first in the nation to unionize earlier this year. Now they're preparing for the first legislative session as an organized body, and they have plenty of issues they plan to take up with state lawmakers.

Austin Jenkins of Northwest News Network reports from Olympia.

Back to Top


References & Links
Family & Children Agencies~~Legal Statutes & Courts~~Other Government Agencies~~Other References

1.      Reference:

Family & Children Agencies

Legal Statutes & Courts

Other Government Agencies

Other References

Back to Top

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. We are not lawyers or affiliated with any lawyers shown. It the the responsibility of the user to check the accuracy and validity of this information. Please review these references for your state; join our Yahoo group; and/or contact a Representative shown in the left margin, for more specific information.

Visit Other States:

Elaine Wolcott-Ehrhardt

Hi there,

This is Susannah Frame. I'm an investigative reporter for KING TV, and over the last several months I have been investigating and airing
stories about a foster child nicknamed Poca. Here is a link to the stories if you're not familiar with them.

I'm now working on a story about what message the Langley's (foster parents of Poca) situation gives to foster parents. I would like to include a group interview of several foster parents for this story. You have probably seen this kind of thing on TV before there's a big group of people and the reporter asks questions and people raise their hands to answer, etc. There's no requirement to speak or be asked specific questions of any one individual. The purpose is more to show a group with the message that more than one foster parent has been through a similar situation.

I am writing to see if any of you feel as though you've been retaliated against by the department, a CASA, Judge, etc. for asking for services, complaining about case plan, disagreeing with direction, etc. Some examples: Have any of you been threatened that your foster child will be removed from your home if you don't stop complaining, disagreeing, etc.? Have any of you quit being a foster parent because of treatment by the department? Are any of you considering not accepting any more placements because of past treatment by the department? Have you had a child removed from your care after 24 months?

If you feel as though your situation (past or present) fits with these scenarios, I would love to have you come to be part of our group interview.

The place is: KING TV
333 Dexter Ave. North
Seattle 98109 ( )

The time is: Monday, October 5th.
Arrival Time 6:45 pm
Interview at 7 pm to 8 pm
Can you please respond to me by email to let me know if you can make it? I would really appreciate that as we hope to get a handle on
how big the group will be as soon as possible.

Please feel free to call me with questions at the number below.

Thank you very much!
Susannah Frame
Investigative Reporter
KING 5 Television

If you are interested in joining our support group, use the link below to subscribe.
Subscribe to fosterparentallegations
Powered by

God Bless, GranPa Chuck
Any Links that Don't Work Please Contact
Weekend WebMaster